Branko Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> >Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> This patch implements my idea for a new API to apr_proc_wait and
> >> apr_proc_all_wait.
> >>
> >
> ><nitpick>
> >I'm a wee bit nervous that we use an enumerated type for a bitmask.
> >Using an enumeration for the values of the bits seems fine but maybe
> >using some unsigned int value is best? We'd expect an enumerated type
> >to hold only the values in the enumeration, not some OR of some of
> >them.
> ></nitpick>
> >
>
> Not so. ISO C explicitly allows this use of enums (and so does ISO C++)..
"We" refers to people, not standards documents or compilers :)
Like I said, it is a nitpick and not something I intend to lose any
sleep over.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
