Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 07:35:06PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > trawick 01/12/12 11:35:06
> >
> > Log:
> > switch Apache/apr/apr-util to use run-time linking on AIX
> > @for i in $(SUBDIRS); do objects="$$objects $$i/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@";
> > done ; \
> > - tmpcmd="$(LINK) @lib_target@"; \
> > + tmpcmd="$(LINK) @lib_target@ @lib_target_libs@"; \
> > echo $$tmpcmd; \
> > $$tmpcmd
>
> This looks suspiciously like the commit I reverted a few days ago.
I don't think so... what this does is add -liconv -lpthread (or
whatever) to the link of libapr.la
the other day we had something different which really was supposed to
get libtool to do something
> Any progress here? Can we rely that AIX will handle EXTRA_LIBS
> being passed in and not choke? Any reason to not switch to use
> libtool inter-library dependencies? (Outside of the libtool 1.4+
> requirement, that is.) This will enable third-parties to easily
> build against apr-util - which is currently not possible. -- justin
EXTRA_LIBS is different from what you passed in, right?
when I switched to run-time linking I also traded one set of libtool
quirks for another (hopefully smaller) set... I'll try to find the
time soon-ish (next 48 hours?) to see if the current set of quirks
will allow the inter-library dependencies to work
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
