On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:50:58AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote: > This is not entirely true. It turns out that although the old shmem API > is prefixed with apr_shmem, it actually prefixes its functions with just > apr_shm, which means there is a name conflict between the two destroy > methods. Looks like we'll have to do a little dance to get this in without > breaking the builds in too many places.
If the patches are done RTC, I'd be comfortable doing it in one pass (just switch all callers and the API at once). That way we have a fighting chance to not break the build. -- justin
