On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 08:18:46AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 5:50 AM >... > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:25:33AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >... > > > _MSC_VER is not namespace protected for APR, and apr_general.h is included > > > > _MSC_VER doesn't have to be namespace protected. He's only testing for it > > (to see if the compiler sets it). Why would it have to be protected? > > For the same reason as HAVE_FOO must be protected using buildconf, etc.
Bill. Stop and think for a moment. HAVE_FOO created problems because *we* defined that symbol. _MSC_VER is not *defined* by us. We're just looking for it. Thus, it is acceptable to *check* for it. Not to define, but to *check*. Clear? Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
