Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>
> > Yes, I completely agree that each structure needs to be 64-bit aligned.
> > I don't see how the shared memory code itself is incorrect. It must be
> > mapping the segment at a properly aligned boundary, so as long as the
> > contents of that segment are accessed in an aligned manner than we're
> > safe, right?
>
> That's what I'm thinking, too. I don't see the problem there. It looks
> to me like you (Aaron) were right on when you suggested that it's
> ap_calc_scoreboard_size() and ap_init_scoreboard()'s fault. Try this, for
> example:
Jeff calling Cliff and Aaron: apr_shm_baseaddr_get() returns
addresses which aren't 64-bit aligned. That is broken. End of story.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
