--- Christian Gross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >APR is not locked into specific models. It could be added on. >(But others may correct me if I am wrong). That is part of the >difference with APR and NSPR. APR can easily be "fixed" whereas NSPR >has problems with this.
An extensible architecture is always a plus. >>Cool. Thing is, I'm toying with the idea of writing an OO DBMS. So >>scalability and high performance are extremely important. Oracle >>uses a portable runtime, btw, there's is called VOS (Virtual OS). >I would REALLY recommend APR!!! APR is simply better suited for >that. Right now I am writing a JavaScript 2.0 implementation for >JSModeler and APR saves my bacon!!! Decisions decisions :) Ok, you say APR is better suited.. but why? ACE looks like its been really thoroughly tested. On the other hand, all the ACE docs talk about networking a LOT. It seems as though the emphasis is on networking... and I don't know if there's much work done on things like disk IO. - Jason __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball http://sports.yahoo.com
