"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 09 March 2002 15:04
>
> > trawick 02/03/09 06:04:11
> >
> > Modified: modules/proxy mod_proxy.c
> > Log:
> > provide missing MAX() macro so that proxy can compile again
> This seems like a common enough thing to deserve a place in APR.
> We can do it like we handle some of the string functions*, or
> we can define an APR_MAX, APR_MIN, etc.
>
> Thoughts?
I'd prefer that you unconditionally define APR_MAX() and APR_MIN()
rather than trying to define MAX() (or MIN) where it isn't defined.
Since MAX() isn't standard by any means, if we defined it we would
become the bad guys w.r.t. namespace protection if we defined it.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
