[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -apr_atomic_t apr_atomic_add(apr_atomic_t *mem, apr_uint32_t val) > +apr_int32_t apr_atomic_add(apr_atomic_t *mem, apr_int32_t val)
Ian, Should we change the 2nd input param to apr_int32_t everywhere? This occured to me when I used -1 there to implement apr_atomic_dec. And the return value for apr_atomic_dec? Letting it go negative could be useful in some apps. Greg
