Kevin Pilch-Bisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 06:17:02PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > prototypes for the new function -- apr_set_sockaddr_vars() -- > > Wouldn't apr_sockaddr_vars_set be a more consistent name for the function?
It would be more consistent with the names of APR APIs, but this isn't an API. I considered such a name before committing, but it seemed uninteresting given given the lack of consistency in the names of other helper functions. But stupidly I've spent more time on this e-mail than it would take to make the change so I'll do it (and update my patches for OS/2 and Win32) :) -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
