It has absolute NOTHING to do with when we chose GA. If we chose GA three months from now, we'd still have these issues.
Calling the server GA is selecting a point in time. There is nothing to say that the particular point we chose is worse than next year. To the naysayers about calling it GA: feh. There is no way we could stay in this mode of "just one more fix." "oh, just one more tweak." Cheers, -g On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 12:29:47AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > Yeah well, maybe if we'd actually paused an thought before jumping into the > GA we'd be in better shape rather than approaching SNAFU. > > david > > > -> This is quite an API change - soon after products > > which rely on it have gone GA. Which is a patent > > way to get breakage - and I seen o compelling need > > for the systems in production today. I guess we need > > a fork/branching and versioning story there. -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
