Hi,
I was just debugging a module and ran into an interesting question.
The module caused a SEGV in
AP_DECLARE(char *) ap_make_full_path(apr_pool_t *a, const char *src1,
const char *src2)
because it passed a NULL in a src2, which caused the segv when
strlen(src2) was called.
My first inclination was to think "what a bonehead thing to do", my
second inclination was that maybe
apr should protect me from myself a bit more....
Wouldn't it make sense to make a path in that case with only src1 as the
content ?
-or-
Wouldn't it make sense fo the function to return a NULL back to the
caller if src1 or src2 are null
-or-
Wouldn't it make sense for me just to check my arguments be for calling
apr :-)
Dave Hill
--
+---------------------oOO--(_)--OOo------------------------+
|Dave Hill (0 0) Unix Software Group |
|Mailstop: ZKO3-2/W17 \//\/ |
|Digital Equipment Corp. (603 )884-2985 |
|110 Spitbrook Road /\//\ enet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
|Nashua, NH 03062-2698 (0_0) |
+---------------------oOO--(_)--OOo------------------------+
