On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:58:29PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > The mutex-based apr_atomic.c code looks like it hasn't really been > finished, but with this patch, the "testatomic" passes except for a "no > surprise" result which I presume is supposed to happen. (without the > patch ATOMIC_HASH could be negative, which was... problematic)
I committed this second part as with that testatomic passes here on my Linux/SMP box. I'll leave the first part up to discussion. -- justin
