Forwarded message: > > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > The reason I suggested a hold to Sander on account of the atomics > > is that we have a bunch of PRs relating to building atomics on > > Solaris that haven't been (yet) resolved. > > > > Hold on a tic... I think I see it... On the systems that fail, > I bet they are using GNUas. If so, then ASCPP is 'gcc -E' and thus > the modification of apr_atomic_sparc.s to apr_atomic_sparc.S fails. > If not using GNUas, apr_atomic_sparc.S simply *is* apr_atomic_sparc.s. > So, the problem is what is it in apr_atomic_sparc.s that makes GNUas > barf. > -- > =========================================================================== > Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ > "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order > will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson >
-- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
