On Fri, 17 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> No, there isn't any OS-specific code in the LDAP section, so the code we
> have is inherently portable. It's only related to how we deal with the
> different LDAP libraries that are available.  For rationale, I see the
> DBMs as the proper predecent.

Hmmmmm... I suppose that's a valid argument.  Okay.

--Cliff


Reply via email to