On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 01:01:48AM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
>
> > Index: time.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/time/win32/time.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.32
> > diff -u -d -r1.32 time.c
> > --- time.c 15 Apr 2002 00:01:09 -0000 1.32
> > +++ time.c 21 May 2002 04:41:09 -0000
> > @@ -215,7 +215,6 @@
> > if (days < 0) {
> > return APR_EBADDATE;
> > }
> > - days -= xt->tm_gmtoff;
> > *t = days * APR_USEC_PER_SEC + xt->tm_usec;
> > return APR_SUCCESS;
> > }
>
> Yeah, that was it. The unix and win32 apr_time_exp_get() functions are
> virtually identical except for that line on win32. Does this patch allow
> the tests to pass? I dug up the original email on the subject (thank you
> MARC ;). Credit for this should go to INOUE Seiichiro
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who originally reported this in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Didn't seem to fix it, though maybe my Windows compile-fu is weak. I'll
leave it up to Will.
-- Jon
