Sander Striker wrote:
That (extern inline) a C99 feature, which most compilers don't understand. GCC had something similar before the new standard.From: Branko Cibej [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 May 2002 21:58
Branko Äibej wrote:
While we're at it, apr_allocator_alloc and apr_allocator_free are also defined inline. I don't think that makes much sense, given the size of those functions.Patrik Husfloen wrote:
I'm getting an error building svn on win32 using VC6.This looks like a bug in APR. Both apr_allocator_set_mutex and apr_allocator_get_mutex are defined with APR_INLINE in apr_pools.c, which is clearly major bogosity. Either that APR_INLINE shoudl go away, or the inline definitions should move to a header (probably apr_allocator.h, where they're declared now), and made static.
I've got the latest version of apr, apr-util and svn (just got them from cvs/svn)
if anyone can confirm this it would be great.
libsvn_subr.lib(svn_error.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Release/svn.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Sander, looks like you're the culprit here (the rev 1.159 commit). Comments?
Hmm, so windows isn't smart enough to do both inlining and exporting? I'd like the stuff inlined in apr_pools.c (for performance), but need them exported for other callers than apr_pools.c.
I'm pretty sure _alloc and _free don't have to be inlined (measurements rule here, of course).Suggestions?
Are _set_mutex and _get_mutex really that sensitive? If yes, they're so trivial that you can easily inline them by hand inside apr_pools.c.
-- Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
