On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Sounds like SMS. We could never overcome speed limitations and we > always seemed to place blame on the function pointers as the reason > why the SMS performance wasn't as good as pools.
We had function pointers *and* wrapper functions. We never tried it with the macros approach (even though I wanted to, I didn't have time to code it before SMS was summarily nuked). > I'd want to see performance metrics saying that we aren't going to > see a massive performance decrease with this. -- justin Knowing Brian, I'm sure he wouldn't suggest anything without considering the performance impact first and foremost. :-] But yeah, I'd like to see the numbers too. --Cliff
