On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Tony Finch wrote: > I note that apr_time_t is a bad name in the first place, because POSIX > reserves all names ending in _t for the implementation. Feel free to > ignore this exceedingly irritating naming rule :-)
I think we uniformly ignore this rule already. Everything in APR that I know of already has a _t suffix (APR-util doesn't follow this standard consistently -- many things in APR-util, including buckets, XML stuff, and strmatch patterns, leave off the _t). I remember when we had this discussion last, and as I recall, everybody agreed it was a stupid rule. :-] --Cliff
