Re: [PATCH] fixes for apr_vformatter

[Jim Jagielski]

Looks like PR9932 explains why we have the current behavior... Not sure
if the change from (sp >= bep) -> (sp > bep) makes sense in this case.
We most likely need to flush when we are *at* bep, but I'm not really
sure. 
-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson