At 04:34 AM 7/10/2002, INOUE Seiichiro wrote:
Thank you for submitting the patch. We took a slightly different approach, since some unix common and accessor code rightly [but incorrectly] assumed that timeout was in usec.
Instead we've reverted to the APR definition of usec's for timeout, and added a timeout_ms just for millisecond tracking.
Your identification of this problem is very much appreciated, I've credited Tanaka as the discoverer of this bug in APR's CREDITS.
Yours,
Bill
