My comments inline:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 02:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > There are currently two possible avenues. > > 1) The code goes into apr-util. > 2) The code goes into a sandbox project. > > The APR option is faster, but there is some misgivings about whether it > belongs in apr-util. The vote was done, and it seems to be accepted, but > Greg was keeping tally, so I don't have the exact numbers about where it > would go. I _think_, and I could be wrong, that it would be put in > apr-util/html as a separate piece of apr-util. > > The second option will take a bit longer, because the sandbox project will > need to be created first. > > I have tried to answer without letting any of my personal opinions show in > the message, because that has caused some problems before. The real > question now, is given those two options, which would you prefer. Not > saying that your preference is the only factor i the decision, but it > should be taken into account. Either one is fine to me. Integrating the code into apr-util is probably an easier setup, but will require more work to adapt to the build system and change the symbols (and of course I'm quite liking the name 'el-kabong' ;-)). > There are also some people questioning why we are moving so quickly on > this. The general feeling is that we should find the best fit before > taking the code. If you are in a rush, then that would change things, but > the understanding was just that you wanted to be kept in the loop about > what is happening. > > Keep pinging, but the conversation is on-going, and very active, so there > is little chance that it won't happen. It is really just a matter of time > now. > > Ryan I'm not in a rush, I just like to know where things stand. Since this discussion is seemingly happening off-list, I can't differentiate between no discussion or a heated one. I'd prefer this to be on-list, as I think it does affect the users of APR, and it would allow me to monitor the progress here. -- Jon
