On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:44:19PM +0100, David Reid wrote: > Not sure I like this. Shouldn't the other project just use the apr files > rather than copying their own versions?
Nope, that's the problem! apr-util needs to be able to build on its own rather than relying upon apr being in ../apr. As Garrett pointed out, the apr-util release is a dud packaging-wise, because ../apr isn't available at configure-time. So, these projects *must* have their own local copies of these particular files. -- justin
