I find myself agreeing with Aaron here. We need to revisit this and fix it correctly...
(Damn - agreeing with Aaron again...) david ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 7:09 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr-util CHANGES apu-config.in > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:31:46PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 11:23:48PM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -0000, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > jerenkrantz 2002/09/18 22:33:18 > > > > > > > > Modified: . CHANGES apu-config.in > > > > Log: > > > > Add --bindir option to apu-config so that users of APR-util have an idea > > > > where apu-config will end up so that they can do later queries after > > > > apu-config is installed. > > > > > > This doesn't make sense. Isn't apu-config only supposed to be used > > > after it's been installed? > > > > No, apu-config can be used when it hasn't been installed. Think > > about how httpd calls it. -- justin > > As I said when apr-config and apu-config were created, it should ONLY > be used from an independently installed APR or APR-UTIL. > > We need to move away from the old way of doing things, like in httpd > or flood where apr and apr-util are bundled with the source. APR > and APR-UTIL should be independently installed on the system. Supporting > both systems is going to be horribly confusing (is this "pre install" or > "post install")... > > -aaron >
