Cliff Woolley wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> > is intrinsicly non-threadsafe (via a static or global state var)
> > or one that requires a change to the apr_shm_create argument list.
> > Neither one sits well. I'd prefer it staying runtime rather than
> > compile-time. Ideas?
> 
> How about apr_shm_create_ex()?  That would be consistent with many other
> things in APR, whereby there's a "simple version" that has some (possibly
> undesirable) default behavior, and an "extra args" version that gives the
> user-code more control.
> 

Ohhh.... me like :)

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Reply via email to