"William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 06:58 AM 10/16/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote: > >Mr. Stewart needs to know in order to rework his SCTP patch > >appropriately. > > > >alternative: > > > >apr_socket_create_ex() which is an interface that has existing > >parameters + protocol parameter > > +1 ... AND when we go to 1.0, we break the API and introduce > the argument to apr_socket_create() and drop _ex(). > > Yes - I know we haven't "Promised" backwards compatibility until > version 1.0. But we've proven we can -usually- achieve it. The only > API totally horked in the last six months was poll, IIRC.
I'm +1 to this sequence too (though I wasn't unhappy about breaking the API now). What I intend to do later today: . minimally tweak the appropriate portions of Mr. Stewart's patch to add apr_socket_create_ex() to APR . update STATUS to indicate that apr_socket_create_ex() API must be deleted and apr_socket_create() API must be changed (new parm) before APR hits 1.0 -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
