On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:39:36PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >I like the idea, but yeah, to have a global mutex on windows you have > >to give it a filename (so the non-related processes can rendezvous on > >the same mutex). > > Doesn't it make more sense to use a file lock instead of a mutex? > [They should be effectively the same construct, performance wise.]
Umm...good point. :) <places bag on head> -aaron
