At 02:44 AM 10/23/2002, Aaron Bannert wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 09:03:02PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> >Hmm... I haven't looked at the new test stuff, but I wonder how it's
>> >going to deal with the testshm* tests, since those tests depend on
>> >fork() and exec() to work.
>>
>> As well as they did before...
>>
>> ... that is, not at all.
>
>How do you mean that they don't work? Anonymous shared memory is not
>currently supported on systems that lack sufficient process inheritance
>mechanisms (ie. fork() and exec()).
I mean, the tests couldn't work (couldn't compile for that matter.)
So we simply walked around those tests.
>> We had a specific sublist of non-win32 modules that was just dropped
>> when we filtered the makefile for win32.
>
>I'm confused as to what you mean by this.
From makefile.in...
NONPORTABLE = \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
PROGRAMS = \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ \
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@
TARGETS = $(PROGRAMS) $(NONPORTABLE)
on win32 we just changed the TARGETS line to
TARGETS = $(PROGRAMS)
when transforming Makefile.in to Makefile.
