--On Thursday, January 9, 2003 11:17 AM -0500 Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

yuck...

move Sander's tag back or back out the change to APR until the
window just prior to 1.0?

As has been pointed out, APR 1.0 must maintain backwards-compatibility with what we're using right now for httpd. In essence, we already froze the APR API the second httpd-2.0 branched off since httpd guaranteed binary compatibility forever (which includes APR). Perhaps we should start considering moving to APR 2.0 *very* soon.


Reverting the change seems like we have an extremely broken versioning process somewhere. I hate that httpd is affecting APR. -- justin

Reply via email to