I think having the .dbg symbols should be quite enough for a normal
httpd installation, so I think fixing the timestamp problem isn't that
important for 0.9.2/2.0.45.
As I said to Bill in another note, the timestamp difference does not seem to cause any problems for me. Using windbg to examine a user.dmp I can point it to the pdb files & source tree, and display the stack trace and variables with no problem.
One point I meant to make... can we make the .dbg simplified symbols -p(rivate) such that they are even smaller? With the full blown .pdb's available to all who are interested, I don't see that as a shortcoming.
+1
If we can really do without the map files once the .dbg's are available, then I see nothing wrong with killing them.
+1
Allan
