On Sat, Mar 22, 2003 at 10:34:24PM -0800, Wan-Teh Chang wrote:
> It seems that apr_atomic_dec should be defined as
> return !atomic_dec_and_test(mem);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Did you invent that macro? I can't find it in FreeBSD.
> >The Netware implementation of apr_atomic_dec() is similar to what
> >I did for FreeBSD:
> >
> >194 inline int apr_atomic_dec(apr_atomic_t *mem)
> >195 {
> >196 atomic_dec(mem);
> >197 return *mem;
> >198 }
>
> This implementation is not atomic.
But it exists in the APR codebase, and is apparently acceptable
to Netware people.
--
Craig Rodrigues
http://home.attbi.com/~rodrigc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
