At 12:29 PM 3/24/2003, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>so is 0.9.2 out?
>
>there are tarballs up, but they're labelled 'alpha', and there hasn't been any 
>kind of announcement of a release that i can find.  should those of us who 
>maintain packages of it feel free to update them to use the tarballs that are 
>there now, or are those going to be replaced with 'non-alpha' tarballs at some 
>point?
>
>just wondering what the status is.

What say you?

We always wait for a day or two for folks to +1/-1 the image's quality.  If we
determine it isn't release quality, the -alpha images stay out there, but won't
be considered a -gold 'release'.  Now, since we aren't at 1.0, we really
should just be saying these are -alpha or -beta, but either way, we need
some folks to say +1.

Actually, we probably should have dropped these into apr.apache.org/dev/dist/
but again, since we are still sort of 'floating' twords 1.0, it probably isn't 
the
end of the world.

Bill


Reply via email to