On Wednesday, April 16, 2003, at 02:28 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, April 15, 2003 9:25 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
again, this is almost completely untested, unix only, and i'm mainly looking
for comments on the interface (both the extended socket options interface
and the APR_SO_MC_REUSEADDR idea).
Looks good on cursory review.
As a nitpick, why not APR_SO_EXT_GROUP_JOIN and apr_socket_join_arg_t instead? Realizing, of course, APR_SO_MC_REUSEADDR needs the MC to avoid the collision (and has the implicit REUSEPORT if available), but do we really have to propagate that MC_ elsewhere? I'm ambivalent on it, but the mc_'s sort of strike me funny. Not a big deal either way... -- justin
no especially good reason. i wanted to make the various multicast specific options obviously multicast specific, but it's not vital that we do so (hell, the underlying socket options don't bother to).
-garrett
