Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Friday, June 6, 2003 6:16 PM +0100 Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Why? This change does not introduce a dependency - it merely takes advantage >> of it if it needs to and it is available. > > What I'm afraid of is that people will see that we're using 'aclocal' and > assume that we're comfortable with using automake and start submitting patches > because automake can do this fancy feature X and we don't support it. > > At this point, I want nothing at all to do with automake. -- justin
Hmm. I would think the absence of a Makefile.am would be enough of a clue, but would a loud comment next to the use of aclocal stating that "APR doesn't use automake and does not want to!" satisfy your objection? Max.
