Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Partial APR Tests:
> Table: ........F
>
> 9 tests run: 8 passed, 1 failed, 0 not implemented.
>
> Failed tests in Table:
> 1) table_overlap: expected <8> but was <7>
With current cvs, that particular subtest (<8> vs <7>) of
table_overlap passes, but a later subtest fails for me. This
patch seems to fix my problem; I don't know if it will fix
yours:
Index: tables/apr_tables.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/tables/apr_tables.c,v
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -r1.48 apr_tables.c
--- tables/apr_tables.c 22 Jun 2003 21:50:25 -0000 1.48
+++ tables/apr_tables.c 23 Jun 2003 12:31:15 -0000
@@ -1176,9 +1176,8 @@
(*sort_next)->key = NULL;
} while (++sort_next <= dup_last);
}
- else {
- last = sort_next;
- }
+
+ last = sort_next;
}
/* Shift elements to the left to fill holes left by removing duplicates */
Index: test/testtable.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/test/testtable.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 testtable.c
--- test/testtable.c 1 Jan 2003 00:01:56 -0000 1.9
+++ test/testtable.c 23 Jun 2003 12:31:15 -0000
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
val = apr_table_get(t1, "a");
CuAssertStrEquals(tc, val, "1");
val = apr_table_get(t1, "b");
- CuAssertStrEquals(tc, val, "2");
+ CuAssertStrEquals(tc, val, "2.");
val = apr_table_get(t1, "c");
CuAssertStrEquals(tc, val, "3");
val = apr_table_get(t1, "d");
--
Joe Schaefer
