(If this has been discussed previously, I apologize. Is there an archive
for this mailing list somewhere?)
I would like to use the multitude of apr tools (hashes, lists, etc) to
interact with shared memory, but alas it appears there's no way to do so
(as I can't implement my own allocator.) Am I incorrect in this
assessment (and if so, how would I create a pool on top of shared
memory?) If I am correct, would providing such an interface be generally
useful and a good/bad idea?
- Re: pool interface for shared memory? Chris Knight
- Re: pool interface for shared memory? Aaron Bannert
- Re: pool interface for shared memory? Chris Knight
- RE: pool interface for shared memory? Sander Striker
- RE: pool interface for shared memory? Cliff Woolley
- Re: pool interface for shared memory? Anthony Howe
- Re: pool interface for shared memory? Aaron Bannert
