At 03:38 PM 9/19/2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >At 01:32 AM 9/19/2003, Mladen Turk wrote: > >>I have a patch (send It back in April) that enable to use the atomic >>from C++ on WIN32. >>The problem is the fact that C++ distinguishes unsigned int and LONG >>mixage as an error.
Never mind my earlier comments - this change is a noop so I've committed as you proposed. There is a better way to determine that we are consistently signed or unsigned moving forwards :-) More later... Bill
