On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:51:33AM +0100, Andrà Malo wrote: > * Joe Orton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > However the problem ist the number designation. If there's a link > > > libcrypt.so-> libcrypt.so.1 it works without the hack. > > > > If there is no such link, then you can't link anything against that > > library, end of story. I presume you only reproduced this by removing > > the symlink? > > Yep, but there's no symlink in /lib but only in /usr/lib.
That's fine. > So the user's system is actually broken? Then we shouldn't jump in, sure. It looks like there is a real failure case where APR does not detect crypt(), yet htpasswd will try to use it regardless, which should be detected at configure-time or at least compile-time. But the system is probably broken to get it in this state, yes. joe
