On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 22:03, Stas Bekman wrote:
> I couldn't find apr_realloc() in the apr API. Is that on purpose or just 
> wasn't needed so far?
> 
> I suppose realloc is hard in the pool architecture, since if you have 
> allocated something after the alloc, you have to move the already allocated 
> memory.

apr_prealloc aswell as apr_pfree are doable.  I can take a look at
revisiting my earlier patches if there is enough interest.

Sander

Reply via email to