On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 22:03, Stas Bekman wrote: > I couldn't find apr_realloc() in the apr API. Is that on purpose or just > wasn't needed so far? > > I suppose realloc is hard in the pool architecture, since if you have > allocated something after the alloc, you have to move the already allocated > memory.
apr_prealloc aswell as apr_pfree are doable. I can take a look at revisiting my earlier patches if there is enough interest. Sander