At 08:01 PM 3/1/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>At 04:14 PM 3/1/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> >>>> (*new)->pool = pool; >>>>+ (*new)->detach = 0; >>> >>>btw, detach was previously uninitialized storage; I dunno what the >>>real-world repurcussions of that are >> >>if it was opaque, is alloc'ed and assigned consistently - then the only side >>effect are the odds that some cases were previously misinterpreted as >>detached. This would have caused ugly side effects, so your patch is fine. > >I was just curious about how harmful in practical terms the occasional >CloseHandle() on the thread handle would be...
I missed the gist of your Q - 18 mos ago I walked through all the cases when the proc handles were used - time to repeat for proc and thread handles. Bill
