On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:26:37PM +0000, Philip Martin wrote: > "Roy T. Fielding" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Another bug due to a sloppy change from time_t to apr_time_t. > > Change days to apr_time_t and remove the above conditional > > (the case of year < 70 is already handled a few lines below). > > * time/unix/time.c (apr_time_exp_get): Remove year check that failed for > 2038, use apr_time_t to avoid overflow. > > * time/win32/time.c (apr_time_exp_get): ditto
Thanks Philip, I've committed this for the next release. joe
