On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 10:44:59 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: >On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 06:56:02PM +0530, Amit Athavale wrote: >> Attached are revised patches (diff against HEAD and changes suggested >> by Joe) > >Thanks, looks good, I'll commit these. > >> Regarding other platforms(beos, win32, os2), I have a simple question ;) >> Do we need to implement apr_shm_remove ? (or just return APR_ENOTIMPL) >> >> Frankly speaking I have very little knowledge about beos and os2. Just >> looking at APIs, I don't think there should be case of orphan segments >> and if it is there, I didn't find a way to remove that segment just on >> the basis of filename like we do in shm_xxx API.
The name of an OS/2's named shared memory block has no relation to the file system. It's just a label that ceases to exist as soon as soon as the last process releases it so a "remove" operation makes no sense. -- ____________________________________________________________________________ __ | Brian Havard | "He is not the messiah! | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | He's a very naughty boy!" - Life of Brian | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
