On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Paul Querna wrote: > Another Place to Look is Bugzilla: > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&email1=&product=APR&keywords=PatchAvailable > > I currently see 17 bugs with PatchAvailable for APR. Surely these should > be considered out before any 1.0 release is made.
Exactly. Those include serious bugs, and proven patches. We are now using a forked APR just to deal with bugs 28450 (a showstopper) and 28453 (enhancement). I can't speak for other bugs on that list, but it seems entirely possible others may have been forced to fork for similar reasons. Doesn't this negate much of the point of having a supposedly-standard package in the first place? -- Nick Kew
