On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:34:49PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 08:24:18AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0100, David Reid wrote: > > > So, I fixed the incorrect tag and rerolled. The revised tarballs > > > (correctly > > > named to keep Joe happy this time) are being uploaded into the usual > > > place, > > > http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ as I write this. > > > > I'm getting a segfault in testsockets on Solaris 9/Intel. No time to > > further > > debug. Is anyone else seeing this? Best I can tell is that an earlier > > test is failing and it's passing a NULL parameter on. > > Does "./testall -v testsockets" give any useful information?
testsockets : |Line 137: expected <0>, but saw <670008> \zsh: 13868 segmentation fault ./testall -v testsockets I was curious why testall doesn't abort a sub-test after a failure, but oh well, I didn't write it... -- justin
