On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 12:52 -0400, Joe Schaefer wrote: > "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > Damn. Competing interests? So, no-one else wants to get 1.0 out teh > > door. Wow, must have been in dream land for a long, long time then... > > The s/apr-config/apr-1-config/ is certainly going to generate > extra work for apr applications that currently build fine with > either 0.9 or HEAD. For example apxs and all apxs-dependent > apache modules that want to support httpd-2.2 will need to use > something better than > > APR_CONFIG=`$APXS -q APR_BINDIR`/apr-config > > However, IMO it's absolutely worth the extra effort > because the name change will guarantee httpd-2.0's > apxs still supplies such modules with the right apr lib. >
This is a separate issue for APXS. It needs another -q item added in 2.1 telling us the name of the binary, not just the directory. (to allow a parallel install of APR, and possibly httpd-2.0/2.1) -Paul Querna
