David Reid wrote:
So, apart from the complaints about apr-util, are people happy that apr RC5 is OK?Here is what I'm getting trying to compile the latest HEAD on WIN32:
Are those who wanted the ldap code yanked now happy that it can be added back in?
david
Creating apr_ldap.h from apr_ldap.hw
Compiling...
apr_ldap_url.c
ldap\apr_ldap_url.c(286) : warning C4013: 'apr_pstrdup' undefined; assuming extern returning int
ldap\apr_ldap_url.c(672) : warning C4013: 'apr_strtok' undefined; assuming extern returning int
apr_ldap_init.c
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(199) : warning C4090: 'function' : different 'const' qualifiers
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : warning C4013: 'const_cast' undefined; assuming extern returning int
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2065: 'ldc' : undeclared identifier
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2223: left of '->host' must point to struct/union
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : warning C4047: 'function' : 'PCHAR' differs in levels of indirection from 'int'
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2223: left of '->port' must point to struct/union
ldap\apr_ldap_init.c(222) : error C2198: 'ldap_sslinit' : too few arguments for call through pointer-to-function
So, if the latest ldap sources are going to be in the 1.0, then they need some fixes.
Regards,
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
