The chances that I have time to look at this are slim to none currently. My time is currently being swallowed by my job and my real life.
Ryan On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:52:27 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 02:46 PM 8/9/2004, malc wrote: > >No, but i would guess taking some tests from GLIBC and/or Win32 Pthreads > >would do, as APIs are quite similar. As for patches, current condition > >variable code is broken beyond repair, the whole aproach can't possibly > >work. There is at least one algorithm that does work and thats the one > >in Win32 Pthreads. I do not have enough expertise in this field to > >contribute any patches tests, i'm not even a Win32 coder. > > Unfortunately, since everything you just mentioned is GPL, afaik, > it's worthless to us. I'll review from a logical perspective. > > Threads and the proposed threading patch I grok (and accept :), > while condition variables I'm less familiar with. Perhaps Bannert, > Bloom and some other condition variable gurus will pipe up. > > Bill > > -- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
