On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:13:02PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 03:47:19PM -0600, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: > > >used as a bitfield like this in the 2.0 branch. For mod_cgi in HEAD it > > >needn't be weird of course, the addrspace field could be left in there. > > I was trying to make head and 2.0 the same, > > my bet for not disconnecting the two branches... > > To do: > > 1- pull back today head httpd and apr changes, it is working and no need to > > touch it, > > 2- back port address_space api and apr_procattr_t field in apr 0.9 branch > > as it is in 1.0, > > Yes, and yes.
I notice you added the APR 0.9 patch to the httpd 2.0 STATUS file, which isn't necessary: you don't need votes to commit stuff to the APR 0.9 branch - just go ahead and do that whenever, so long as your changes don't break backwards compatibility (which these don't). Send the patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you're ever unsure. Regards, joe
