Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Well, I should run the test with verbose:
Listed only the one with verbose messages
(both SUCCESS and FAIL).
I hate to ask this: but have these tests ever worked? I guess it's
sucky that some tests fail on Win32, but if they never worked, I don't
consider it a showstopper. (There just aren't enough Win32 developers
to look at it?)
Well, I'm not an apr commiter.
In about 10 patches I propose eventually
one or two get even looked in :(.
Here is the patch for makefile that at least makes testall not hanging.
(There was no readchild.exe to read the pipes).
So, you may commit that, and one error less :).
Index: Makefile.win
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/test/Makefile.win,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 Makefile.win
--- Makefile.win 26 Jul 2004 15:21:59 -0000 1.22
+++ Makefile.win 26 Aug 2004 16:34:40 -0000
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
sendfile.exe \
proc_child.exe \
tryread.exe \
- occhild.exe\
+ occhild.exe \
+ readchild.exe \
sockchild.exe \
testlockperf.exe \
testshmproducer.exe \
@@ -39,6 +40,9 @@
occhild.exe: occhild.obj $(LOCAL_LIBS)
$(LINK) occhild.obj $(LOCAL_LIBS) $(ALL_LIBS)
+
+readchild.exe: readchild.obj $(LOCAL_LIBS)
+ $(LINK) readchild.obj $(LOCAL_LIBS) $(ALL_LIBS)
proc_child.exe: proc_child.obj $(LOCAL_LIBS)
$(LINK) /debug /subsystem:console /machine:I386 \
We *need* to get 1.0 out the door. We've done *SIX* (to paraphrase our
British developers, "bloody fricking *SIX*") release candidates for 1.0
so far. This is insane! I don't blame David if he loses his sanity
about now.
1.0 does *not* need to perfect. At some point, we need to ship. -- justin
Sure.
But please don't shoot the messanger :).
Regards,
MT.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
