At 11:03 PM 11/19/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >--On Friday, November 19, 2004 8:01 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL >PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I'll offer compelling argument. Allen offered patches, which >>Roy vetoed, to fix object sizes on 32/64/64 ILP bit platforms, >>and told Allen to go back and fix APR. > >I don't believe that Allen would be able to complete his changes in a >reasonable timeframe.
>So, my opinion is that we let Allen branch apr off now and let him go at it at >a measured pace, but we shouldn't intend to hold httpd 2.2 for that. -- I guess the ball is to Allen, then, but I'd also be happy to quickly whack at it. The concept is Simple(tm) and would be far less painful than actually fighting through all the ( cast )s of his later patches. Bill
