Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 06:26:33AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:34:10 +0100, Uwe Zeisberger
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Joe Orton wrote:
> > > > Here's what I propose to fix this, anything I'm missing?
> > 
> > it makes sense to me
> 
> OK, thanks, I've committed that fix to the trunk.  Uwe, thanks for
> tracking this down.
Yesterday I noted a compatablity issue with this change:

If an application uses the new convention and is linked using a lib
without the change (i.e. 1.0.0) a NULL-Pointer is dereferenced by the
assignment of to_convert.  (This is why `if (inbuf)' was added to line
389 of xlate.c.)

Bye
Uwe

-- 
Uwe Zeisberger

http://www.google.com/search?q=5%2B7

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to